Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mahadeo Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Mahadeo Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 22, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053992

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mahadeo Singh

Advocate Shri. A.K.Jain

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.2598/13 22/02/13 shri a.k.jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri sanjeev kumar singh, learned panel lawyer for the state. petitioner has filed an application before respondent no.2 on 23/01/13 under section 248 and grievance of the petitioner is that cognizance of the application is not being taken note of and no orders have been passed. once, an application is filed before the statutory authority under the statutory provisions, the authority is required to pass appropriate orders on the application and cannot refuse to take cognizance of the same. keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that on the petitioner's filing a certified copy of this order along with the relevant documents before respondent no.2, the said respondent shall proceed in the matter and decide the application of the petitioner in accordance with the requirement of law if required after hearing all concerned and after issuing notice. with the aforesaid, petition stands disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge vy/-

Full Judgment

W.P.No.2598/13 22/02/13 Shri A.K.Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for the State.

Petitioner has filed an application before respondent No.2 on 23/01/13 under Section 248 and grievance of the petitioner is that cognizance of the application is not being taken note of and no orders have been passed.

Once, an application is filed before the statutory authority under the statutory provisions, the authority is required to pass appropriate orders on the application and cannot refuse to take cognizance of the same.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that on the petitioner's filing a certified copy of this order along with the relevant documents before respondent No.2, the said respondent shall proceed in the matter and decide the application of the petitioner in accordance with the requirement of law if required after hearing all concerned and after issuing notice.

With the aforesaid, petition stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge Vy/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial