Williams Vs. Missouri

Williams vs Missouri

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jul-06-1983

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/105396

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/105396
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jul-06-1983
Case Number: 463 U.S. 1301
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Williams

Respondent

Missouri

Excerpt

.....a petition for certiorari to review the missouri supreme court's affirmance of his conviction and death sentence. justice blackmun, circuit justice. on may 31, 1983, the supreme court of missouri affirmed applicant williams' conviction and death sentence. 652 s.w.2d 102. it noted applicant's execution was set for july 15. on june 30, the missouri supreme court denied applicant's timely motion for rehearing, and his motion requesting that court to stay issuance of its mandate pending final disposition of a petition for certiorari in this court. under the rules of this court, applicant has until august 29, 1983, to file a petition for certiorari. he has applied to me for a stay of execution pending timely filing and disposition of that petition. the application is granted. "[d]irect appeal is the primary avenue for review of a conviction or sentence." barefoot v. estelle, ante at 463 u. s. 887 . if a federal question is involved, the process of direct review "includes the right to petition this court for a writ of certiorari." ibid. a stay of execution obviously is essential to realization of this right if the execution otherwise would occur prior to the expiration of a defendant's time to petition this court for direct review. the defendant must have at least one opportunity to present to the full court his claims that page 463 u. s. 1302 his death sentence has been imposed unconstitutionally. for this reason, if a state schedules an execution to take place before filing and disposition of a petition for certiorari, i must stay that execution pending completion of direct review, as a matter of course.

Full Judgment

Williams v. Missouri - 463 U.S. 1301 (1983)
U.S. Supreme Court Williams v. Missouri, 463 U.S. 1301 (1983)

Williams v. Missouri

No. A-1077

Decided July 6, 1983

463 U.S. 1301

ON APPLICATION FOR STAY

SYLLABUS

An application for a stay of execution pending timely filing and disposition of a petition for certiorari is granted, where the execution is set for a date before expiration of the period for applicant's filing a petition for certiorari to review the Missouri Supreme Court's affirmance of his conviction and death sentence.

JUSTICE BLACKMUN, Circuit Justice.

On May 31, 1983, the Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed applicant Williams' conviction and death sentence. 652 S.W.2d 102. It noted applicant's execution was set for July 15. On June 30, the Missouri Supreme Court denied applicant's timely motion for rehearing, and his motion requesting that court to stay issuance of its mandate pending final disposition of a petition for certiorari in this Court. Under the Rules of this Court, applicant has until August 29, 1983, to file a petition for certiorari. He has applied to me for a stay of execution pending timely filing and disposition of that petition. The application is granted.

"[D]irect appeal is the primary avenue for review of a conviction or sentence." Barefoot v. Estelle, ante at 463 U. S. 887 . If a federal question is involved, the process of direct review "includes the right to petition this Court for a writ of certiorari." Ibid. A stay of execution obviously is essential to realization of this right if the execution otherwise would occur prior to the expiration of a defendant's time to petition this Court for direct review. The defendant must have at least one opportunity to present to the full Court his claims that

Page 463 U. S. 1302

his death sentence has been imposed unconstitutionally. For this reason, if a State schedules an execution to take place before filing and disposition of a petition for certiorari, I must stay that execution pending completion of direct review, as a matter of course.

Same Court & Year US Supreme Court · 1983 Same Parties Williams vs Missouri Same Subject Education