Devendra Kumar JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Devendra Kumar Jain vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 10, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053914

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1053914
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Apr 10, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devendra Kumar Jain

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no ::5043. / 2013 devendra kumar jain versus state of mp and others 10.04.2013. shri sushil mishra for the petitioner. shri b.p.pandey, deputy government advocate, for the state/respondents. considering the fact that representation of the petitioner is pending consideration before respondent no.2 - commissioner, jabalpur, for the present without entering into the controvers.on merits, respondent no.2 is directed to consider and decide the claim in accordance to law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. with the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No ::

5043. / 2013 Devendra Kumar Jain versus State of MP and others 10.04.2013.

Shri Sushil Mishra for the petitioner.

Shri B.P.Pandey, Deputy Government Advocate, for the State/respondents.

Considering the fact that representation of the petitioner is pending consideration before respondent No.2 - Commissioner, Jabalpur, for the present without entering into the controveRs.on merits, respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the claim in accordance to law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Devendra Kumar Jain vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition