Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mukesh Vs. Vaibhav

Mukesh vs Vaibhav

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 10, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053897

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mukesh

Advocate Shri. Sunil Mishra

Respondent

Vaibhav

Excerpt

1 m.a.no.5152/07. 10.4.2013 . shri sunil mishra, learned counsel for the appellant. the record of the tribunal has already been received. heard on the question of admission. the appellant/ claimant has filed this appeal for enhancement of the sum awarded by the 2nd member accident claims tribunal, astha district sehore, in mvc no.116/06, whereby his claim with respect of the injuries sustained by him in the vehicular accident has been awarded against the respondent no.1 and 2 by saddling their joint and several liability for the sum of rs.5,200/- along with the interest @ 6% p.a.from the date of the filing the claim petition. having heard the counsel at length, i have carefully gone through the record of the tribunal along with the impugned award. in the alleged accident after sustaining the injuries the appellant was taken to the hospital where after medical examination his mlc report ex. p.23 was prepared and on advise of the doctor some x-ray was also carried out and its report ex.p.24 was prepared, which were placed on record of the claim case no.115/06 of the tribunal. according to such mlc report ex.p.23 he sustained one lacerated wound in dorsal aspect of rt. foot. in view of such injury the aforesaid sum awarded by the tribunal rs.5,200/- is just and proper. pursuant to it, the same does not require any interference for further enhancement, consequently this appeal being devoid of any merits is hereby dismissed at the stage of motion hearing. (u. c.maheshwari) judge k

Full Judgment

1 M.A.No.5152/07.

10.4.2013 .

Shri Sunil Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant.

The record of the Tribunal has already been received.

Heard on the question of admission.

The appellant/ claimant has filed this appeal for enhancement of the sum awarded by the 2nd Member Accident Claims Tribunal, Astha District Sehore, in MVC No.116/06, whereby his claim with respect of the injuries sustained by him in the vehicular accident has been awarded against the respondent No.1 and 2 by saddling their joint and several liability for the sum of Rs.5,200/- along with the interest @ 6% p.a.from the date of the filing the claim petition.

Having heard the counsel at length, I have carefully gone through the record of the Tribunal along with the impugned award.

In the alleged accident after sustaining the injuries the appellant was taken to the hospital where after medical examination his MLC report Ex.

P.23 was prepared and on advise of the doctor some x-ray was also carried out and its report Ex.P.24 was prepared, which were placed on record of the Claim Case No.115/06 of the Tribunal.

According to such MLC report Ex.P.23 he sustained one lacerated wound in dorsal aspect of Rt.

Foot.

In view of such injury the aforesaid sum awarded by the Tribunal Rs.5,200/- is just and proper.

Pursuant to it, the same does not require any interference for further enhancement, consequently this appeal being devoid of any merits is hereby dismissed at the stage of motion hearing.

(U.

C.Maheshwari) Judge k

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial