Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sultan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Sultan Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jun 27, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053862

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sultan Singh

Advocate Shri. Sanjiv Kumar Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 writ petition no.10923/13. 27.6.2013 . shri sanjiv kumar singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. heard on the question of admission. the petitioner has filed this petition under article 226 of constitution of india for issuing appropriate writ directing the authorities of the respondents not to interfere in his peaceful possession of the disputed land bearing survey no.36 area 1.813 hectare situated at pushprajgarh district anuppur. in the cours.of the arguments on admission, in view of the papers placed on record according to which various disputed facts are involved in the matter which could not be adjudicated by this court under writ jurisdiction, on making certain query from the petitioner's counsel, on which instead to argue further he seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file civil suit before the appropriate forum. considering such prayer without expressing any opinion on merit of the matter, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed with liberty aforesaid.c.c. as per rules. (u. c.maheshwari) judge k

Full Judgment

1 Writ Petition No.10923/13.

27.6.2013 .

Shri Sanjiv Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Petitioner.

Heard on the question of admission.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuing appropriate writ directing the authorities of the respondents not to interfere in his peaceful possession of the disputed land bearing survey No.36 area 1.813 hectare situated at Pushprajgarh District Anuppur.

In the couRs.of the arguments on admission, in view of the papers placed on record according to which various disputed facts are involved in the matter which could not be adjudicated by this Court under writ jurisdiction, on making certain query from the petitioner's counsel, on which instead to argue further he seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file civil suit before the appropriate forum.

Considering such prayer without expressing any opinion on merit of the matter, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed with liberty aforesaid.C.C.

as per rules.

(U.

C.Maheshwari) Judge k

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial