Ramdas Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Ramdas vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Mar 21, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053614

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1053614
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Mar 21, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramdas

Advocate Shri. Praveen Pandey

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

.....to punished the respondent no. 2 and 4. (iv) any other relief, which this hon'ble court deems fit and proper may also be granted to the petitioners.at the stage of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in a similar matter w.p. no. 21519/2011 a statement was made on behalf of state government that no action is being proceeded for the present. accordingly, the said writ petition was disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner that if she has any grievance, she may represent the collector, jabalpur, who shall ensure that the rights accruing to the petitioner by virtue of the patta granted are no. taken away without following the due process of law. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present petition may also be disposed of in the light of above direction. since the petitioners have to submit that no action in the present is taken by the respondents, no cause of action accrues at this stage. in case, in future any action is taken by the respondents, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek redressal in accordance with law. petition is disposed of finally in above terms.c.c. as per rules. (sanjay yadav) judge vivek tripathi

Full Judgment

W.P. No.21791 Of 2011 21.3.2013 Shri Praveen Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.The petition is for following direction: (i) That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to not remove the petitioners from their house, where they are living since long back and possessing the permanent lease granted by the state govt.

in the year 1984, 1998 under the Madhya Pradesh Nagirya Kshetron Ke Bhumiheen Vyaktiyon ke Pattadhikaron ka Pradan Kiya Jana Adhiniyam, 1984.

(ii) That, Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to No. to take any coercive action against the petitioners and their houses.

(iii) That, this Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to direct to the authority of the Manav Adhikar Ayog and any other competent authority to inquire the matter regarding illegal act of the respondents they are misusing of their power and trying to forcefully dispossessed the house of petitioners and other poor person after considering the enquiry report the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to punished the respondent No. 2 and 4.

(iv) Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also be granted to the petitioneRs.At the stage of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in a similar matter W.P. No. 21519/2011 a statement was made on behalf of State Government that no action is being proceeded for the present. Accordingly, the said writ petition was disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner that if she has any grievance, she may represent the Collector, Jabalpur, who shall ensure that the rights accruing to the petitioner by virtue of the patta granted are No. taken away without following the due process of law.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present petition may also be disposed of in the light of above direction.

Since the petitioners have to submit that no action in the present is taken by the respondents, no cause of action accrues at this stage.

In case, in future any action is taken by the respondents, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek redressal in accordance with law.

Petition is disposed of finally in above terMs.C.c. as per rules.

(SANJAY YADAV) JUDGE Vivek Tripathi

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Ramdas vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education