Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Munna Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Munna vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Mar 21, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053604

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Munna

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.2058/2013 21/03/2013 shri madan singh, advocate for the applicants. shri a.k.singh, ga for the respondent/state. heard finally. this is the firs.application filed by applicants under section 439 of the cr.p.c for grant of bail. applicants have been arrested on 3/01/2013 in connection with crime no.8/13 registered at p.s.pathariya, district damoh for the offence punishable under sections 498-a, 304-b, 34 of ipc and section 3/ 4 of the dowry prohibition act. learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants have been falsely implicated in the case. applicant no.1 is father-in-law and applicant no.2 is brother-in-law (devar) of deceased kanchan who died within 7 years of her marriage. it is further submitted that there is only general allegation against these applicants in regard to cruelty and demand of dowry. charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to be disposed of finally therefore, he prays for bail to these applicants. learned counsel for the state opposes the application. considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case alongwith the nature of allegation made against these applicants, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release them on bail. therefore, without commenting on the merit of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicants munna and halle shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.35,000/- (rs.thirty five thousand only) each with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of committal court/trial court, for securing their presence before the said court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge navin

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.2058/2013 21/03/2013 Shri Madan Singh, Advocate for the applicants.

Shri A.K.Singh, GA for the respondent/State.

Heard finally.

This is the fiRs.application filed by applicants under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of bail.

Applicants have been arrested on 3/01/2013 in connection with Crime No.8/13 registered at P.S.Pathariya, District Damoh for the offence punishable under sections 498-A, 304-B, 34 of IPC and section 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants have been falsely implicated in the case.

Applicant no.1 is father-in-law and applicant no.2 is brother-in-law (devar) of deceased Kanchan who died within 7 years of her marriage.

It is further submitted that there is only general allegation against these applicants in regard to cruelty and demand of dowry.

Charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to be disposed of finally therefore, he prays for bail to these applicants.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the application.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case alongwith the nature of allegation made against these applicants, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release them on bail.

Therefore, without commenting on the merit of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicants Munna and Halle shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.35,000/- (Rs.Thirty Five Thousand only) each with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Committal Court/trial Court, for securing their presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.SOLANKI) Judge navin

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial