Harishankar Vs. Vijay Singh

Harishankar vs Vijay Singh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jun 17, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053543

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1053543
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jun 17, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Harishankar

Advocate Shri. Ashish Shrivastava

Respondent

Vijay Singh

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.9266/2013, 17.6.2013 . shri ashish shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri lalit joglekar, learned p.l.for the respondent/state. heard on the question of admission. the petitioners has filed this petition under article 227 of constitution of india for issuing appropriate direction to the respondent no.6, tahsildar to decide the revenue case no.5- a/20/09-10 on some early date on which the final argument was heard on 7.5.2012. having heard the counsel in the available circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits of this matter this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.6 tahsildar to decide the aforesaid revenue case of the petitioner within one month from the date of filing the certified copy of this order in the office of such authorities by the petitioner. the petitioner is directed to submit the copy of this order in the office of such authorities within fifteen days from today. let a copy of this order be also sent to the concerning collector with a direction to take appropriate step in the matter for not deciding the aforesaid revenue case for more than one years after hearing the arguments on 7.5.2012.c.c. as per rules. (u. c.maheshwari) judge k

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.9266/2013, 17.6.2013 .

Shri Ashish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the Petitioner.

Shri Lalit Joglekar, learned P.L.for the respondent/State.

Heard on the question of admission.

The petitioners has filed this petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India for issuing appropriate direction to the respondent No.6, Tahsildar to decide the Revenue Case No.5- A/20/09-10 on some early date on which the final argument was heard on 7.5.2012.

Having heard the counsel in the available circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits of this matter this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.6 Tahsildar to decide the aforesaid Revenue case of the petitioner within one month from the date of filing the certified copy of this order in the office of such authorities by the petitioner.

The petitioner is directed to submit the copy of this order in the office of such authorities within fifteen days from today.

Let a copy of this order be also sent to the concerning Collector with a direction to take appropriate step in the matter for not deciding the aforesaid revenue case for more than one years after hearing the arguments on 7.5.2012.C.C.

as per rules.

(U.

C.Maheshwari) Judge k

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Harishankar vs Vijay Singh Same Subject Education