Subhash Subramanium Vs. Revashankar

Subhash Subramanium vs Revashankar

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 26, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053321

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1053321
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Apr 26, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Subhash Subramanium

Advocate Shri. Devesh Khatri

Respondent

Revashankar

Excerpt

m.c.c.no.234/13 26-04-2013 heard shri devesh khatri, learned counsel for applicant on i.a.no.4492/13 for condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration which is supported by an affidavit of the learned counsel for the applicant. the application is allowed for the reasons mentioned therein. also heard on the application for restoration of mcc no.1478/12. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant being a poor person could not deposit the cost of rs.2000/- within the stipulated period as directed by this court on 02.01.2013 in mcc no.1478/12 as a result of which m.a.no.1597/06 could not be restored to its original number. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the amount has been deposited on 08.02.2013. the application is supported by an affidavit of the applicant and as the reasons stated therein appear to be bona fide, the application for restoration is allowed. the impugned order dated 02.01.2013 passed in mcc no.1478/12 is recalled and m.a.no.1597/06 is directed to be restored to its original number. m.c.c.stands allowed accordingly. a copy of this order be placed in the record of m.a.no.1597/2006 c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

M.C.C.No.234/13 26-04-2013 Heard Shri Devesh Khatri, learned counsel for applicant on I.A.No.4492/13 for condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration which is supported by an affidavit of the learned counsel for the applicant.

The application is allowed for the reasons mentioned therein.

Also heard on the application for restoration of MCC No.1478/12.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant being a poor person could not deposit the cost of Rs.2000/- within the stipulated period as directed by this court on 02.01.2013 in MCC No.1478/12 as a result of which M.A.No.1597/06 could not be restored to its original number.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the amount has been deposited on 08.02.2013.

The application is supported by an affidavit of the applicant and as the reasons stated therein appear to be bona fide, the application for restoration is allowed.

The impugned order dated 02.01.2013 passed in MCC No.1478/12 is recalled and M.A.No.1597/06 is directed to be restored to its original number.

M.C.C.stands allowed accordingly.

A copy of this order be placed in the record of M.A.No.1597/2006 C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Subhash Subramanium vs Revashankar Same Subject Education