P.C.C. Construction Vs. Abhay Traders

P.C.C. Construction vs Abhay Traders

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 08, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053279

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1053279
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jan 08, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.C.C. Construction

Advocate Shri. Vivek Rusia

Respondent

Abhay Traders

Advocate Shri. Y.K.Gupta

Excerpt

m.cr.r.no.7506/2011 m.cr.c.no.7506/2011 8.1.2013 shri vivek rusia, counsel for the petitioners.shri y.k.gupta, counsel for the respondent. the respondent ram kumar gupta is also present in person. he is duly identified by his counsel. his presence is marked. the learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants are giving two different demand drafts of rs.3 lacs and rs.1 lac respectively to the respondent and therefore, the criminal complaint pending before the trial court for trial of offence punishable under section 138 of negotiable instruments act may be quashed. the respondent agrees that if he gets a sum of rs.4 lacs then, he is not required to prosecute the criminal complaint. looking to the willingness of the parties, both the demand drafts be handed over to the respondent with the direction that the criminal complaint case no.205/2010, pending before the chief judicial magistrate, panna is hereby quashed, according to the compromise done by the parties. with the aforesaid directions, the present petition is hereby disposed off. m.cr.r.no.7506/2011 a copy of the order be sent to the trial court for information and compliance. certified copy as per rules. (n.k.gupta) judge pushpendra

Full Judgment

M.Cr.R.No.7506/2011 M.Cr.C.No.7506/2011 8.1.2013 Shri Vivek Rusia, counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Y.K.Gupta, counsel for the respondent.

The respondent Ram Kumar Gupta is also present in person.

He is duly identified by his counsel.

His presence is marked.

The learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants are giving two different demand drafts of Rs.3 Lacs and Rs.1 Lac respectively to the respondent and therefore, the criminal complaint pending before the trial Court for trial of offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act may be quashed.

The respondent agrees that if he gets a sum of Rs.4 Lacs then, he is not required to prosecute the criminal complaint.

Looking to the willingness of the parties, both the demand drafts be handed over to the respondent with the direction that the criminal complaint case No.205/2010, pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panna is hereby quashed, according to the compromise done by the parties.

With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is hereby disposed off.

M.Cr.R.No.7506/2011 A copy of the order be sent to the trial Court for information and compliance.

Certified copy as per rules.

(N.K.GUPTA) JUDGE Pushpendra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties P.C.C. Construction vs Abhay Traders Same Subject Education