Raseed Vs. the State of M.P.

Raseed vs The State of M.P.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided May 16, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053231

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1053231
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: May 16, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raseed

Advocate Shri. V.P.Singh

Respondent

The State of M.P.

Excerpt

1...cr.a.no.938 of 2005 rasheed state of m.p.16.05.2013 shri v.p.singh, counsel for the appellant. shri p.k.kaurav, learned addl. a.g.for the respondents. i.a.11351 of 2013 : for correction of sessions trial number in the order dated 18.4.2013. it is submitted by the appellant that in the memo of appeal by mistake case number has been typed as s.t.no.515 of 2002 while the correct number of sessions trial is 486 of 2002. it is submitted that it was in fact crime number and not the sessions trial number. we have perused the record and from the perusal of the sessions trial no.486 of 2002, we find the aforesaid contention correct. in view of the aforesaid, we direct that the order dated 18.4.2013 passed by this court on the application of the appellant under section 389(1) of criminal procedure code be treated in respect of sessions trial no.486 of 2002 [crime no.515 of 2002 of p.s.hanumantal district jabalpur].accordingly this application is allowed. certified copy today. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt. vimla jain) acting chief justice judge vj 2...cr.a.no.938 of 2005 rasheed state of m.p.16.05.2013

Full Judgment

1...Cr.A.No.938 of 2005 Rasheed State of M.P.16.05.2013 Shri V.P.Singh, Counsel for the appellant.

Shri P.K.Kaurav, learned Addl.

A.G.for the respondents.

I.A.11351 of 2013 : For correction of Sessions Trial number in the order dated 18.4.2013.

It is submitted by the appellant that in the memo of appeal by mistake case number has been typed as S.T.No.515 of 2002 while the correct number of Sessions Trial is 486 of 2002.

It is submitted that it was in fact Crime Number and not the Sessions Trial number.

We have perused the record and from the perusal of the Sessions Trial No.486 of 2002, we find the aforesaid contention correct.

In view of the aforesaid, we direct that the order dated 18.4.2013 passed by this Court on the application of the appellant under Section 389(1) of Criminal Procedure Code be treated in respect of Sessions Trial No.486 of 2002 [Crime No.515 of 2002 of P.S.Hanumantal district Jabalpur].Accordingly this application is allowed.

Certified copy today.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.

Vimla Jain) Acting Chief Justice Judge vj 2...Cr.A.No.938 of 2005 Rasheed State of M.P.16.05.2013

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Raseed vs The State of M.P. Same Subject Education