Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sanjay Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Sanjay Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 07, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053137

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanjay Kumar

Advocate Shri. Ganga Prasad Patel

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.574/2013 07.02.2013 shri ganga prasad patel, learned counsel for the applicant. shri punit shroti, learned pl for the respondent-state. heard. learned pl submits that he is under receipt of the case diary. on behalf of the applicant, this petition is preferred under section 438 of cr.p.c.for grant of anticipatory bail as he is under apprehension of his arrest in connection of crime no.422/2012, registered at police station panagar, district jabalpur for the offence under sections 379 of ipc and section 136 of the electricity act 2003. in the cours.of arguments on merits of the petition, in response of some query of the court based on the situation of the case, applicant's counsel seeks permission to withdraw this petition as not pressed with further appropriate direction to the trial court to that after surrendering by the applicant, if any application for grant of bail is filed on his behalf then the same be considered and decided by the concerning court on its own merits on some early date from the date of filing the same. on consideration by allowing the aforesaid prayer, the petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed with the direction to the court concerned that after surrendering by the applicant in the impugned case, if any bail application is filed on his behalf, then the same be considered on its own merits and adjudicate the same within three days from the date of filing the same. c c as per rules. ( u.c.maheshwari ) judge bks

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.574/2013 07.02.2013 Shri Ganga Prasad Patel, learned counsel for the applicant.

Shri Punit Shroti, learned PL for the respondent-State.

Heard.

Learned PL submits that he is under receipt of the case diary.

On behalf of the applicant, this petition is preferred under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.for grant of anticipatory bail as he is under apprehension of his arrest in connection of Crime No.422/2012, registered at Police Station Panagar, District Jabalpur for the offence under Sections 379 of IPC and Section 136 of the Electricity Act 2003.

In the couRs.of arguments on merits of the petition, in response of some query of the court based on the situation of the case, applicant's counsel seeks permission to withdraw this petition as not pressed with further appropriate direction to the trial court to that after surrendering by the applicant, if any application for grant of bail is filed on his behalf then the same be considered and decided by the concerning court on its own merits on some early date from the date of filing the same.

On consideration by allowing the aforesaid prayer, the petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed with the direction to the court concerned that after surrendering by the applicant in the impugned case, if any bail application is filed on his behalf, then the same be considered on its own merits and adjudicate the same within three days from the date of filing the same.

C c as per rules.

( U.C.Maheshwari ) Judge bks

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial