Arvind Kumar Shah Vs. M.P.Power Generating Company Ltd.

Arvind Kumar Shah vs M.P.Power Generating Company Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 28, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053097

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1053097
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Feb 28, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arvind Kumar Shah

Respondent

M.P.Power Generating Company Ltd.

Excerpt

writ petition no.449/2009 28.02.2013 mr.r.n.tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. mr.rajas pohankar, learned counsel for the respondents. learned counsel for the respondents submitted that petitioner had appeared for recruitment on the post of junior engineer (trainee).the cut-off marks of the written examination were fixed as 36. the petitioner secured 26 marks in the written examination. therefore, the petitioner did not clear the written examination. the respondents prays for and is granted one weeks' time to bring on record the result of the petitioner. the respondents shall keep the relevant record in respect of selection for recruitment on the post junior engineer (trainee) on the next date of hearing. (alok aradhe) judge rc.

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No.449/2009 28.02.2013 Mr.R.N.Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr.Rajas Pohankar, learned counsel for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that petitioner had appeared for recruitment on the post of Junior Engineer (Trainee).The cut-off marks of the written examination were fixed as 36.

The petitioner secured 26 marks in the written examination.

Therefore, the petitioner did not clear the written examination.

The respondents prays for and is granted one weeks' time to bring on record the result of the petitioner.

The respondents shall keep the relevant record in respect of selection for recruitment on the post Junior Engineer (Trainee) on the next date of hearing.

(Alok Aradhe) Judge RC.

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Arvind Kumar Shah vs M.P.Power Generating Company Ltd. Same Subject Education