Sushil Kumar Shukla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Sushil Kumar Shukla vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 30, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1052913

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1052913
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jan 30, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sushil Kumar Shukla

Advocate Shri. Y.P.Sharma

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 30/1/2013 shri y.p.sharma, counsel for the petitioner. smt. nirmala nayak, government advocate for the respondent /state. this petition has been preferred under section 482 of cr.p.c, seeking quashment of fir lodged by the junior supply officer at crime no.128/08 for the offence under sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of ipc and under sections 3/7 of essential commodity act against the petitioner. let case diary be called for. in alternative copy of the petition along with annexures also be made available to the arguing counsel for the state. list the matter in the week commencing from 25/2/2013 for consideration of stay application. (tarun kumar kaushal) judge dcs/-

Full Judgment

1 30/1/2013 Shri Y.P.Sharma, counsel for the petitioner.

Smt.

Nirmala Nayak, Government Advocate for the respondent /State.

This petition has been preferred under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, seeking quashment of FIR lodged by the Junior Supply Officer at Crime No.128/08 for the offence under Sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC and under Sections 3/7 of Essential Commodity Act against the petitioner.

Let case diary be called for.

In alternative copy of the petition along with Annexures also be made available to the arguing counsel for the State.

List the matter in the week commencing from 25/2/2013 for consideration of stay application.

(Tarun Kumar Kaushal) JUDGE dcs/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Sushil Kumar Shukla vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education