Rahul Dixit Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Rahul Dixit vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 30, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1052893

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1052893
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jan 30, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rahul Dixit

Advocate Shri. Shailash Tiwari

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 30/1/2013 shri p.r.bhave, senior counsel with shri shailash tiwari, counsel for the petitioners.smt. nirmala nayak, government advocate for the respondent /state. this petition has been preferred under section 482 of cr.p.c, for quashment of fir registered at crime no.45/12 at police kotwali, hoshangabad and subsequent trial, based under section 498-a of ipc, on the basis of report of respondent no.2. let notice of this petition be issued to respondent no.2 by rad. steps within two working days. notice be made returnable within one week. list the matter in the week commencing from 18/2/13. in the meantime, learned government advocate shall ensure the availability of the case diary. (tarun kumar kaushal) judge dcs/-

Full Judgment

1 30/1/2013 Shri P.R.Bhave, Senior Counsel with Shri Shailash Tiwari, counsel for the petitioneRs.Smt.

Nirmala Nayak, Government Advocate for the respondent /State.

This petition has been preferred under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, for quashment of FIR registered at Crime No.45/12 at Police Kotwali, Hoshangabad and subsequent trial, based under Section 498-A of IPC, on the basis of report of respondent No.2.

Let notice of this petition be issued to respondent No.2 by RAD.

Steps within two working days.

Notice be made returnable within one week.

List the matter in the week commencing from 18/2/13.

In the meantime, learned Government Advocate shall ensure the availability of the case diary.

(Tarun Kumar Kaushal) JUDGE dcs/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Rahul Dixit vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education