Devraj Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Devraj Mishra vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 04, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1052580

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1052580
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 04, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devraj Mishra

Advocate Shri. Sudhanshu K. Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

devraj mishra versus state of m.p.& ors.writ petition no.16507 ”4. 8.2012 shri sudhanshu k. singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri piyush dharmadhikari, learned government advocate, on advance notice for respondents/state. petitioner has been suspended vide order dated 23.11.2010, as the suspension has continued for more than three months petitioner seeks enhancement of suspension allowance to 75% in accordance to circular and policy of the state government. as claim of petitioner for enhancement of subsistence allowance is not being considered, this writ petition is filed. keeping in view the fact that the disciplinary authority has not considered the claim of petitioner for enhancement of subsistence allowance, for the present without entering into controvers.on merit it is directed that on petitioner's filing certified copy of this order along with copies of the representation the disciplinary authority shall decide the claim of petitioner for enhancement of subsistence allowance retrospectively with effect from the date of entitlement by a speaking order within one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. with the aforesaid the petition stands disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge ss*

Full Judgment

Devraj Mishra versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.16507 ”

4. 8.2012 Shri Sudhanshu K.

Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned Government Advocate, on advance notice for respondents/State.

Petitioner has been suspended vide order dated 23.11.2010, as the suspension has continued for more than three months petitioner seeks enhancement of suspension allowance to 75% in accordance to circular and policy of the State Government.

As claim of petitioner for enhancement of subsistence allowance is not being considered, this writ petition is filed.

Keeping in view the fact that the disciplinary authority has not considered the claim of petitioner for enhancement of subsistence allowance, for the present without entering into controveRs.on merit it is directed that on petitioner's filing certified copy of this order along with copies of the representation the disciplinary authority shall decide the claim of petitioner for enhancement of subsistence allowance retrospectively with effect from the date of entitlement by a speaking order within one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid the petition stands disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss*

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Devraj Mishra vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education