Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajesh Kumar Lodhi Vs. Sanjeev Singh

Rajesh Kumar Lodhi vs Sanjeev Singh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 29, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1052151

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajesh Kumar Lodhi

Advocate Shri. N.S.Pathak

Respondent

Sanjeev Singh

Advocate Shri. Ashok Chourasiya

Excerpt

conc. petition no.646/2013 (r.k.lodhi versus sanjeev singh and others.29.08.2013 shri n.s.pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri ashok chourasiya, learned counsel for the respondent no.3/ contemnor. ms.ranjana nagar, chief executive officer, gotegaon is personally present before this court. as inspite of orders being passed by this court on previous occasion, the chief executive officer, janpad panchayat gotegaon was not present in the court except for filing an incomplete reply to the contempt petition, inspite of several opportunities, therefore, this court had directed issuance of bailable warrant against the c.e.o.janpad panchayat gotegaon for ensuring her personal presence on 29.08.2013 i.e.today. pursuant to the order passed by this court the c.e.o.janpad panchayat, gotegaon is personally present before this court. it is stated that though reply had been filed by the respondent no.3 denying the claim of the petitioner, however, subsequently on examining the case of the petitioner, a sum of rs.39,893/- which is the arrears of pay for the period 07.08.2007 up to 04.09.2009, has been paid to the petitioner. looking to the fact that the order passed by this court has been complied with, the contempt petition is disposed of by recording the statement of the c.e.o., janpad panchayat, gotegaon tendering unconditional apology and undertaking that she shall be extremely careful while dealing with court cases in future and shall ensure prompt compliance of the orders passed by the courts. by recording the aforesaid statements, the contempt petition stands disposed of. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

Conc.

Petition No.646/2013 (R.K.Lodhi versus Sanjeev Singh and otheRs.29.08.2013 Shri N.S.Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Ashok Chourasiya, learned counsel for the respondent No.3/ Contemnor.

Ms.Ranjana Nagar, Chief Executive Officer, Gotegaon is personally present before this court.

As inspite of orders being passed by this court on previous occasion, the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Gotegaon was not present in the court except for filing an incomplete reply to the contempt petition, inspite of several opportunities, therefore, this court had directed issuance of bailable warrant against the C.E.O.Janpad Panchayat Gotegaon for ensuring her personal presence on 29.08.2013 i.e.today.

Pursuant to the order passed by this court the C.E.O.Janpad Panchayat, Gotegaon is personally present before this court.

It is stated that though reply had been filed by the respondent No.3 denying the claim of the petitioner, however, subsequently on examining the case of the petitioner, a sum of Rs.39,893/- which is the arrears of pay for the period 07.08.2007 up to 04.09.2009, has been paid to the petitioner.

Looking to the fact that the order passed by this court has been complied with, the contempt petition is disposed of by recording the statement of the C.E.O., Janpad Panchayat, Gotegaon tendering unconditional apology and undertaking that she shall be extremely careful while dealing with court cases in future and shall ensure prompt compliance of the orders passed by the courts.

By recording the aforesaid statements, the contempt petition stands disposed of.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial