Shiv Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Shiv Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 27, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1052060

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1052060
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Feb 27, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shiv Kumar

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.1352/2013 27.2.2013 shri rakesh sharma, advocate for the applicant. shri r.k.kesarwani, pl for the state. this is the firs.bail application filed by the applicant under section 438 of the cr.p.c.for grant of anticipatory bail. the applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with crime no.340/2012 registered at p.s.suatla, district narsinghpur for the offence punishable under sections 302, 304/34 of the ipc. learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant is falsely implicated in this case. none has stated against the applicant. the applicant is a reputed citizen of the locality, in the event of arrest, his reputation will be tarnished, therefore, he be enlarged on anticipatory bail. learned counsel for the state has opposed the application and submitted that main witnesses of the case are yet to be examined under section 161 of the cr.p.c., therefore, this application is liable to be dismissed. i have perused the case diary. main witnesses of the case are yet to be examined by the i.o., therefore, at this stage i do not find it a fit case to release the applicant on anticipatory bail. application is hereby dismissed. (g.s.solanki) judge pb

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.1352/2013 27.2.2013 Shri Rakesh Sharma, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State.

This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of anticipatory bail.

The applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No.340/2012 registered at P.S.Suatla, District Narsinghpur for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 304/34 of the IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant is falsely implicated in this case.

None has stated against the applicant.

The applicant is a reputed citizen of the locality, in the event of arrest, his reputation will be tarnished, therefore, he be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel for the State has opposed the application and submitted that main witnesses of the case are yet to be examined under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C., therefore, this application is liable to be dismissed.

I have perused the case diary.

Main witnesses of the case are yet to be examined by the I.O., therefore, at this stage I do not find it a fit case to release the applicant on anticipatory bail.

Application is hereby dismissed.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Shiv Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education