Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Naeem Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Naeem vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 27, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1052016

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Naeem

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.1271/2013 27.2.2013 shri a.k.jain, advocate for the applicant. shri akhilendra singh, ga for the state. learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been released on ad-interim anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 29.1.2013 and the applicant did not misuse the liberty granted to him. learned government advocate has opposed the application. since applicant has already been released on ad-interim anticipatory bail by this court and there is no report that he misused the liberty granted to him, the order dated 29.1.2013 is hereby made absolute for a period of 60 days only. in the meanwhile, if the applicant so desires, may apply for regular bail before the competent court, which shall be considered by that court, in accordance with law. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge pb

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.1271/2013 27.2.2013 Shri A.K.Jain, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Akhilendra Singh, GA for the State.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been released on ad-interim anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 29.1.2013 and the applicant did not misuse the liberty granted to him.

Learned Government Advocate has opposed the application.

Since applicant has already been released on ad-interim anticipatory bail by this Court and there is no report that he misused the liberty granted to him, the order dated 29.1.2013 is hereby made absolute for a period of 60 days only.

In the meanwhile, if the applicant so desires, may apply for regular bail before the competent Court, which shall be considered by that Court, in accordance with law.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Naeem vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales