Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shankar Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Shankar Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 27, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051989

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shankar Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.2981/2013 27.2.2013 mr.a.k.gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners.mr.r.tiwari, learned government advocate for the respondents. with the consent of parties, the matter is heard finally. in this writ petition, the petitioner, inter alia , seeks a direction to the respondents to absorb the services of the petitioners in adhyapak samvarg from shiksha karmi- iii. learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the controvers.involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by order dated 30.7.2012 passed by indore bench of this court in w.p.no.7387/2012(s).in view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and as agreed to by them, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of order passed by division bench in w.a.no.596/2010 (gopal chawla and others versus state of m.p.and others.and pass appropriate orders.needless to state, the competent authority shall pass a speaking order and shall take decision within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. c.c.as per rules. (alok aradhe) judge rc

Full Judgment

W.P.No.2981/2013 27.2.2013 Mr.A.K.Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Mr.R.Tiwari, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

With the consent of parties, the matter is heard finally.

In this writ petition, the petitioner, inter alia , seeks a direction to the respondents to absorb the services of the petitioners in Adhyapak Samvarg from Shiksha Karmi- III.

Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the controveRs.involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by order dated 30.7.2012 passed by Indore Bench of this Court in W.P.No.7387/2012(S).In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and as agreed to by them, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of order passed by Division Bench in W.A.No.596/2010 (Gopal Chawla and others versus State of M.P.and otheRs.and pass appropriate ordeRs.Needless to state, the competent authority shall pass a speaking order and shall take decision within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.

C.C.as per rules.

(Alok Aradhe) Judge RC

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial