Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shakil Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Shakil vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 27, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051986

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shakil

Advocate Shri. Hinanshu Chaurasiya

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.1671/2013 27.2.2013 shri hinanshu chaurasiya, counsel for the applicant(s).shri puneet shroti, pl for the respondent/state. heard. the applicants are in custody since october, 2012 in connection with crime no.751/2012 registered at p.s.kotwali district sehore for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 336, 294, 307, 509, 506 of ipc. learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in this case. it is further submitted that injured suffered injury on his forearm said to have been caused by sword. the injured has already been discharged from the hospital. charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicants. learned counsel for the state opposes the prayer. on due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, i am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicants. the application is allowed. it is directed that applicants shall be released on bail on their each furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/trial court concerned, for their appearance before the said court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said court during trial. c.c.as per rules. (g.s.solanki) ravi judge

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.1671/2013 27.2.2013 Shri Hinanshu Chaurasiya, counsel for the applicant(s).Shri Puneet Shroti, PL for the respondent/State.

Heard.

The applicants are in custody since October, 2012 in connection with Crime No.751/2012 registered at P.S.Kotwali District Sehore for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 336, 294, 307, 509, 506 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in this case.

It is further submitted that injured suffered injury on his forearm said to have been caused by sword.

The injured has already been discharged from the hospital.

Charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicants.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer.

On due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicants.

The application is allowed.

It is directed that applicants shall be released on bail on their each furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Committal Court/Trial Court concerned, for their appearance before the said Court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said Court during trial.

C.C.as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) ravi JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial