Ramesh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Ramesh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 27, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051970

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1051970
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Feb 27, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramesh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no ::2996. / 2013 ramesh versus state of madhya pradesh and others 27.02.2013. shri yogendra patel for the petitioner. shri samdarshi tiwari, government advocate, for the state on advance notice. against the order-dated 16.1.2012 - annexure p/2, petitioner has a remedy of filing a writ petition before the board of revenue. but, it seems that the petitioner could not file the revision within the statutory period of limitation and, therefore, has approached this court. petitioner is a member belonging to the scheduled tribe community and keeping in view the rights of the petitioner, interest of justice requires that he should be granted permission to file the revision and the delay in filing the same should be condoned. in view of the above, it is directed that in case petitioner files an application before the board of revenue against the order in question, within a period of 15 days from today, the board of revenue shall consider and decide the revision of the petitioner on merits and shall not dismiss it on the ground of delay. with the aforesaid observation, the petition stands allowed and disposed of. certified copy as per rules today. (rajendra menon) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No ::

2996. / 2013 Ramesh versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others 27.02.2013.

Shri Yogendra Patel for the petitioner.

Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, Government Advocate, for the State on advance notice.

Against the order-dated 16.1.2012 - Annexure P/2, petitioner has a remedy of filing a writ petition before the Board of Revenue.

But, it seems that the petitioner could not file the revision within the statutory period of limitation and, therefore, has approached this Court.

Petitioner is a member belonging to the Scheduled Tribe community and keeping in view the rights of the petitioner, interest of justice requires that he should be granted permission to file the revision and the delay in filing the same should be condoned.

In view of the above, it is directed that in case petitioner files an application before the Board of Revenue against the order in question, within a period of 15 days from today, the Board of Revenue shall consider and decide the revision of the petitioner on merits and shall not dismiss it on the ground of delay.

With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands allowed and disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules today.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Ramesh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education