Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shaheed Bari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Shaheed Bari vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 27, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051965

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shaheed Bari

Advocate Shri. R.K.Thakur

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

criminal revision no.1645/2012 27.02.2013 shri r.k.thakur, counsel for the applicant. shri vinot fauzdar, panel lawyer for the respondent/state. heard on i.a.no.4672/2013, an application for condonation of delay in filing the present revision. the present revision is filed against the judgment dated 4.11.2004 passed by the learned j.m.f.c.jabalpur in criminal case no.2268/03, whereby the applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under section 283 of ipc on the basis of admission and sentenced for the period, which he has already undergone in the custody. after considering the various reasons mentioned in the application filed by the applicant, those reasons are not acceptable for condonation of delay for more than six years.under such circumstances, without any basis such a huge delay cannot be condoned. consequently, i.a.no.4672/2013 is hereby dismissed and hence, the revision filed by the applicant is also dismissed being barred by limitation. (n.k.gupta) judge pnkj

Full Judgment

Criminal Revision No.1645/2012 27.02.2013 Shri R.K.Thakur, counsel for the applicant.

Shri Vinot Fauzdar, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.

Heard on I.A.No.4672/2013, an application for condonation of delay in filing the present revision.

The present revision is filed against the judgment dated 4.11.2004 passed by the learned J.M.F.C.Jabalpur in criminal case no.2268/03, whereby the applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 283 of IPC on the basis of admission and sentenced for the period, which he has already undergone in the custody.

After considering the various reasons mentioned in the application filed by the applicant, those reasons are not acceptable for condonation of delay for more than six yeaRs.Under such circumstances, without any basis such a huge delay cannot be condoned.

Consequently, I.A.No.4672/2013 is hereby dismissed and hence, the revision filed by the applicant is also dismissed being barred by limitation.

(N.K.GUPTA) JUDGE pnkj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial