Deshraj Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Deshraj vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jun 24, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051900

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1051900
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jun 24, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deshraj

Advocate Dr. Anuvad Shrivastava

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no.10420/2013 24.06.2013 dr. anuvad shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri lalit joglekar, learned pl for respondents. the petitioner working as kotwar/choukidar of the village has filed this petition under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuing appropriate writ of mandamus directing the authority of respondents to decide his claim/representation, (ann. p-5).in the light of notification dated 3.3.2010, (ann. p-3) and the order of this court dated 17.1.2013, (ann. p-4) passed in w.p.no.939/2009. having heard the counsel, in the available circumstances, instead to admit or issuing any notice to the other side, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the authority of respondents to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, (ann. p-5).keeping in view the aforesaid notification (annexure p-3) and order of this court, (ann. p-4) in a speaking manner within six months from the date of submitting a copy of this order alongwith copy of the petition with annexures in the office of respondent no.2 under intimation to the petitioner. the petitioner is directed to submit aforesaid papers in the office of respondent no.2 in two sets within fifteen days from today. c c as per rules. (u.c.maheshwari) judge bks

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No.10420/2013 24.06.2013 Dr.

Anuvad Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Lalit Joglekar, learned PL for respondents.

The petitioner working as Kotwar/Choukidar of the village has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing appropriate writ of Mandamus directing the authority of respondents to decide his claim/representation, (Ann.

P-5).in the light of notification dated 3.3.2010, (Ann.

P-3) and the order of this court dated 17.1.2013, (Ann.

P-4) passed in W.P.No.939/2009.

Having heard the counsel, in the available circumstances, instead to admit or issuing any notice to the other side, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the authority of respondents to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, (Ann.

P-5).keeping in view the aforesaid notification (Annexure P-3) and order of this Court, (Ann.

P-4) in a speaking manner within six months from the date of submitting a copy of this order alongwith copy of the petition with Annexures in the office of respondent No.2 under intimation to the petitioner.

The petitioner is directed to submit aforesaid papers in the office of respondent No.2 in two sets within fifteen days from today.

C c as per rules.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge bks

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Deshraj vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition