Pintu @ Pradeep Kumar and anr. Vs. the State of M.P.

Pintu @ Pradeep Kumar and anr. vs The State of M.P.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jun 24, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051895

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1051895
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jun 24, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pintu @ Pradeep Kumar and anr.

Advocate Shri. Sumit Tiwari

Respondent

The State of M.P.

Excerpt

cr.a.no.867/1997 24/06/2013 shri sumit tiwari, learned counsel for the appellants. shri pramod chourasiya, learned panel lawyer for the state. heard learned counsel for the parties on i.a.no.13151/2013 an application filed under section 389(1) of the criminal procedure code. in view of the non-appearance of the counsel for the appellants that the case was taken up for hearing on 15.1.2013 and bailable warrant has been issued and the appellants have been arrested. it is pointed out that on 23.9.1997 the appellants were granted exemption from appearing and they were regularly appearing before the court of chief judicial magistrate shahdol but only because of the non-appearance of the counsel, the impugned action has been taken. the appellants submit that they shall regularly appear and make representation as to when the case is listed for hearing. keeping in view the same, it is directed that the appellants (pintu @ pradeep kumar & sanjay mishra) be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- (rs.ten thousand only) each with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for their appearance before the court of chief judicial magistrate umariya on 19.8.2013 and on such other dates as may be ordered by the trial court. with the aforesaid, the application i.a.no.13151/2013 stands allowed and disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge nd

Full Judgment

Cr.A.No.867/1997 24/06/2013 Shri Sumit Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellants.

Shri Pramod Chourasiya, learned Panel Lawyer for the State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A.No.13151/2013 an application filed under Section 389(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

In view of the non-appearance of the counsel for the appellants that the case was taken up for hearing on 15.1.2013 and bailable warrant has been issued and the appellants have been arrested.

It is pointed out that on 23.9.1997 the appellants were granted exemption from appearing and they were regularly appearing before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate Shahdol but only because of the non-appearance of the counsel, the impugned action has been taken.

The appellants submit that they shall regularly appear and make representation as to when the case is listed for hearing.

Keeping in view the same, it is directed that the appellants (Pintu @ Pradeep Kumar & Sanjay Mishra) be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- (Rs.Ten Thousand Only) each with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for their appearance before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate Umariya on 19.8.2013 and on such other dates as may be ordered by the trial court.

With the aforesaid, the application I.A.No.13151/2013 stands allowed and disposed of.

Certified Copy as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge nd

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Pintu @ Pradeep Kumar and anr. vs The State of M.P. Same Subject Education