M/S Unity Constructions Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.

M/S Unity Constructions vs Madhya Pradesh State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 20, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051787

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1051787
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 20, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M/S Unity Constructions

Advocate Shri. Sudhir Kumar Shrivastava

Respondent

Madhya Pradesh State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.

Advocate Shri. S.A.Dharmadhikari

Excerpt

w.p.no.10091/2012 20.7.2012 shri sudhir kumar shrivastava, counsel for petitioner. shri p.k.kaurav, dy.a.g., for respondent no.1. shri s.a.dharmadhikari, counsel for respondent no.2. learned counsel for petitioner submitted that at present petitioner is seeking direction against respondent no.1 to decide the representation filed by the petitioner, which are still pending with it. on raising such contention shri kaurav, learned dy.a.g., submitted that the petitioner has not served copy of petition, so he is not in a position to make any statement in the matter. in view of aforesaid petitioner is directed to serve a copy of petition along with annexures to shri kaurav, during the cours.of the day, against acknowledgment. be listed for hearing on 25.7.2012. c.c., as per rules. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt.vimla jain) judge judge m.

Full Judgment

W.P.No.10091/2012 20.7.2012 Shri Sudhir Kumar Shrivastava, counsel for petitioner.

Shri P.K.Kaurav, Dy.A.G., for respondent no.1.

Shri S.A.Dharmadhikari, counsel for respondent no.2.

Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that at present petitioner is seeking direction against respondent no.1 to decide the representation filed by the petitioner, which are still pending with it.

On raising such contention Shri Kaurav, learned Dy.A.G., submitted that the petitioner has not served copy of petition, so he is not in a position to make any statement in the matter.

In view of aforesaid petitioner is directed to serve a copy of petition along with annexures to Shri Kaurav, during the couRs.of the day, against acknowledgment.

Be listed for hearing on 25.7.2012.

C.C., as per rules.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.Vimla Jain) JUDGE JUDGE M.

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties M/S Unity Constructions vs Madhya Pradesh State Tourism Devel... Same Subject Education