Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Narayan Soni Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Narayan Soni vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 31, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051728

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narayan Soni

Advocate Shri. V.D.S. Chauhan

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.18306/12 (s) 31/10/12 shri v.d.s. chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri s.s.bisen, learned govt. adv.for the state. considering the fact that representation filed by the petitioner with regard to his transfer from one gram panchayat to another is pending before the competent authority, for the present, without entering into the controvers.on merits, the competent authority is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and till the representation is so decided, status quo in the matter as is existing today shall be maintained. with the aforesaid, petition stands disposed of.c.c. as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge vy/-

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.18306/12 (s) 31/10/12 Shri V.D.S.

Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Govt.

Adv.for the State.

Considering the fact that representation filed by the petitioner with regard to his transfer from one Gram Panchayat to another is pending before the competent authority, for the present, without entering into the controveRs.on merits, the competent authority is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and till the representation is so decided, status quo in the matter as is existing today shall be maintained.

With the aforesaid, petition stands disposed of.C.C.

as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge Vy/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial