Narendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Narendra Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 31, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051727

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1051727
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 31, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narendra Singh

Advocate Shri. Y.K.Gupta

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.1795 / 2012 (narendra singh..vs..state of m.p.& others.31-10-2012 shri y.k.gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri b.p.pandey, learned g.a.for the state/respondents. heard on the question of admission. the learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at length, submits that the petition be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to apply afresh under the national agriculture development scheme which has been promulgated for increasing the production to onions and has been flouted by the state of m.p.vide annexure p-1. in the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to apply afresh before the respondent/authorities under the aforesaid scheme. it is further directed that in case the petitioner does so along with a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the same shall be processed, in case so permissible, by the concerned authority in accordance with law expeditiously. it is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner and, therefore, the respondent/authorities while deciding the matter would be at liberty to take into consideration all facts and facets of the case and thereafter take a decision thereon by either accepting or rejecting the same. with the aforesaid liberty/directions the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge mct with the aforesaid directions the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge

Full Judgment

W.P.No.1795 / 2012 (Narendra Singh..Vs..State of M.P.& otheRs.31-10-2012 Shri Y.K.Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri B.P.Pandey, learned G.A.for the State/respondents.

Heard on the question of admission.

The learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at length, submits that the petition be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to apply afresh under the National Agriculture Development Scheme which has been promulgated for increasing the production to onions and has been flouted by the State of M.P.vide Annexure P-1.

In the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to apply afresh before the respondent/authorities under the aforesaid scheme.

It is further directed that in case the petitioner does so along with a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the same shall be processed, in case so permissible, by the concerned authority in accordance with law expeditiously.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner and, therefore, the respondent/authorities while deciding the matter would be at liberty to take into consideration all facts and facets of the case and thereafter take a decision thereon by either accepting or rejecting the same.

With the aforesaid liberty/directions the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge mct With the aforesaid directions the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.