Bhavan Kishore Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Bhavan Kishore vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 31, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051723

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1051723
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 31, 2012
Subject: Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Constitution

Key legal issue: Constitution

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bhavan Kishore

Advocate Smt. Gulab K. Patel

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.17015/12 (s) 31/10/12 smt. gulab k. patel, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri rajesh tiwari, learned govt. adv.for the state. petitioner by this writ petition is seeking relief for grant of pension after counting the service rendered by him in the erstwhile department. records indicate that claiming the said benefit, petitioner has already represented and the same is pending consideration before respondent no.2. in view of the above, for the present, without entering into the controvers.on merit, respondent no.2 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of two months thereof. respondents shall decide the claim by a speaking order after recording reasons and communicate the same to the petitioner. with the aforesaid, petition stands disposed of.c.c. as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge vy/-

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.17015/12 (s) 31/10/12 Smt.

Gulab K.

Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt.

Adv.for the State.

Petitioner by this writ petition is seeking relief for grant of pension after counting the service rendered by him in the erstwhile department.

Records indicate that claiming the said benefit, petitioner has already represented and the same is pending consideration before respondent No.2.

In view of the above, for the present, without entering into the controveRs.on merit, respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of two months thereof.

Respondents shall decide the claim by a speaking order after recording reasons and communicate the same to the petitioner.

With the aforesaid, petition stands disposed of.C.C.

as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge Vy/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Bhavan Kishore vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Constitution