Moolchand Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Moolchand vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 31, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051692

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1051692
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 31, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Moolchand

Advocate Shri. M. Pateriya

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

moolchand versus state of m.p.& ors.writ petition no.18091 ”31. 10.2012 shri m. pateriya, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri rajesh tiwari, learned government advocate for the state, on advance notice. petitioner is working as daily wages employee on the post of cook in the respondent's establishment and claims regularization in service on the ground that he has completed more than 20 years of service. he is working regularly since 1990 and is entitled to regularization in the light of principles laid down by the supreme court in the case of secretary, state of karnataka versus uma devi, 2006(4) scc, 1, and the policies formulated by the state government on 16/05/2007 and further on 06/09/08, claiming regularization, petitioner has filed this writ petition. keeping in view the aforesaid contentions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondents are directed to examine case of the petitioner for regularization in accordance to policies and circulars of the state government and pass appropriate orders in the matter of regularization of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. the petition stands allowed and disposed of with the aforesaid. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge ss*

Full Judgment

Moolchand versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.18091 ”

31. 10.2012 Shri M.

Pateriya, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Government Advocate for the State, on advance notice.

Petitioner is working as daily wages employee on the post of Cook in the respondent's establishment and claims regularization in service on the ground that he has completed more than 20 years of service.

He is working regularly since 1990 and is entitled to regularization in the light of principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka versus Uma Devi, 2006(4) SCC, 1, and the policies formulated by the State Government on 16/05/2007 and further on 06/09/08, claiming regularization, petitioner has filed this writ petition.

Keeping in view the aforesaid contentions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondents are directed to examine case of the petitioner for regularization in accordance to policies and circulars of the State Government and pass appropriate orders in the matter of regularization of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

The petition stands allowed and disposed of with the aforesaid.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss*

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Moolchand vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education