Sabana Azami Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Sabana Azami vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 31, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051683

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1051683
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 31, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sabana Azami

Advocate Shri. Rajesh Dubey

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.17654/2012 31.10.2012 shri rajesh dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri vivek sharma, learned panel lawyer, for respondents. the only controvers.involved in the writ petition is claim of consideration for promotion as is prescribed in the rules known as madhya pradesh panchayat adhyapak samvarg (recruitment and condition of service) rules, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as 'rules').it is contended that as per the schedule iv of the aforesaid rules assistant adhyapak are to be promoted on the post of adhyapak on completion of requisite years of service. according to the petitioner she has completed the requisite years of services yet her claim has not been considered. looking to the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.4 to ascertain the vacancies on the post of adhyapak and to convene a dpc in terms of the rules aforesaid expeditiously to consider the claim of petitioner for promotion on the post of adhyapak. let the aforesaid exercise be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. with the aforesaid writ petition is disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (k.k.trivedi) judge. a.praj.

Full Judgment

W.P.No.17654/2012 31.10.2012 Shri Rajesh Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Vivek Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, for respondents.

The only controveRs.involved in the writ petition is claim of consideration for promotion as is prescribed in the rules known as Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Adhyapak Samvarg (Recruitment and Condition of service) Rules, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules').It is contended that as per the Schedule IV of the aforesaid Rules Assistant Adhyapak are to be promoted on the post of Adhyapak on completion of requisite years of service.

According to the petitioner she has completed the requisite years of services yet her claim has not been considered.

Looking to the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.4 to ascertain the vacancies on the post of Adhyapak and to convene a DPC in terms of the Rules aforesaid expeditiously to consider the claim of petitioner for promotion on the post of Adhyapak.

Let the aforesaid exercise be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.

With the aforesaid writ petition is disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge.

A.Praj.

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Sabana Azami vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education