Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vinay Kumar Jhariya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Vinay Kumar Jhariya vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 05, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051545

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinay Kumar Jhariya

Advocate Shri. Rajesh Dubey

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no.16282/201”05. 10.2012 shri rajesh dubey, learned counsel for the petitioners.heard on the question of admission and interim relief. admit. issue notices to the respondents, on both counts, on payment of p.f.within seven days, failing which the petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the court. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in view of the provisions of rule 13 of the m.p.jan shiksha rules, 2003, as the petitioners are entitled to continue as a jan shikshak for a period of three years from the date of nomination which have not elapsed since the date of deputation of the petitioners.therefore, operation of the impugned order be stayed. it is stated that in identical case arising out of the same issue, this court has issued interim direction in w.p.no.14506/2011, w.p.no.16533/2011 and w.p.no.16807/2011 vide orders dated 29.08.2011, 29.09.2011 and 01.10.2011 respectively. in view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the present petition is identical to the aforesaid petitions, keeping the concept of parity in mind, similar directions as issued by this court in w.p.nos.14506/2011, 16533/2011 and 16807/2011 are also issued in this case and it is directed that the operation of the impugned order dated writ petition no.16282/201”27. 08.2012 (annexure p-5) as far as it relates to the petitioners.shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing. list along with w.p.nos.14506/2011, 16533/2011 and 16807/2011 by showing them separately in the cause list. certified copy as per rules. (k.k.trivedi) judge skc

Full Judgment

WRIT PETITION No.16282/201”

05. 10.2012 Shri Rajesh Dubey, learned Counsel for the petitioneRs.Heard on the question of admission and interim relief.

Admit.

Issue notices to the respondents, on both counts, on payment of P.F.within seven days, failing which the petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.

It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that in view of the provisions of Rule 13 of the M.P.Jan Shiksha Rules, 2003, as the petitioners are entitled to continue as a Jan Shikshak for a period of three years from the date of nomination which have not elapsed since the date of deputation of the petitioneRs.therefore, operation of the impugned order be stayed.

It is stated that in identical case arising out of the same issue, this Court has issued interim direction in W.P.No.14506/2011, W.P.No.16533/2011 and W.P.No.16807/2011 vide orders dated 29.08.2011, 29.09.2011 and 01.10.2011 respectively.

In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that the present petition is identical to the aforesaid petitions, keeping the concept of parity in mind, similar directions as issued by this Court in W.P.Nos.14506/2011, 16533/2011 and 16807/2011 are also issued in this case and it is directed that the operation of the impugned order dated WRIT PETITION No.16282/201”

27. 08.2012 (Annexure P-5) as far as it relates to the petitioneRs.shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing.

List along with W.P.Nos.14506/2011, 16533/2011 and 16807/2011 by showing them separately in the cause list.

Certified copy as per rules.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge Skc

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial