Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kusum Devi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Kusum Devi vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 03, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051141

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kusum Devi

Advocate Shri. Himanshu Shukla

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.17888/2012 (kusum devi versus state of mp and others.03.12.2012 heard shri himanshu shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. the petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 24.09.2012 passed by the sub divisional officer, tahsil huzur, district rewa wherein he has directed registration of an f.i.r.in respect of the misappropriation of rs.eight lacs and the loss of documents which are not being made available inspite of the fact that several applications and opportunities were given to the concerned persons. admittedly, the impugned order passed by the s.d.o.can be assailed by the petitioner before the appellate authority in accordance with law. in the circumstances, at this stage the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case the petitioner takes up an appropriate proceedings before the appellate authority within 15 days, the appellate authority be directed that the appeal of the petitioner may not be dismissed only on the ground of limitation. prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted and it is observed that in case the petitioner takes up the appropriate proceedings before the appellate authority within 15 days along with a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the appellate authority shall consider it on merits and shall not dismiss the same only on the ground of limitation. with the aforesaid observations, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

W.P.No.17888/2012 (Kusum Devi versus State of MP and otheRs.03.12.2012 Heard Shri Himanshu Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 24.09.2012 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Tahsil Huzur, District Rewa wherein he has directed registration of an F.I.R.in respect of the misappropriation of Rs.eight lacs and the loss of documents which are not being made available inspite of the fact that several applications and opportunities were given to the concerned persons.

Admittedly, the impugned order passed by the S.D.O.can be assailed by the petitioner before the appellate authority in accordance with law.

In the circumstances, at this stage the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case the petitioner takes up an appropriate proceedings before the appellate authority within 15 days, the appellate authority be directed that the appeal of the petitioner may not be dismissed only on the ground of limitation.

Prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted and it is observed that in case the petitioner takes up the appropriate proceedings before the appellate authority within 15 days along with a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the appellate authority shall consider it on merits and shall not dismiss the same only on the ground of limitation.

With the aforesaid observations, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial