Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dhanaiya Vs. Kamata

Dhanaiya vs Kamata

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 01, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1050638

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dhanaiya

Respondent

Kamata

Excerpt

s.a.no.1646/2006 01.08.2012 shri akhil singh, advocate for the appellants. shri alok jain, advocate has filed i.a.no.7572/2012 to change the counsel. as per the averments made in the application it is apparent that the respondents want to change their counsel and engage shri alok jain, advocate. considering the reasons so stated in the application, it is allowed. shri alok jain, advocate may file his vakalatnama within a week. heard on i.a.no.7582/2012, which is an application for deleting the name of appellant no.1 who has died. considering the reasons so stated in the application, it is allowed. permission to delete the name of appellant no.1 granted. needful be done within a week. list this case on 22nd august, 2012 for orders on i.a.no.7883/2012. (j.k.maheshwari) judge ap

Full Judgment

S.A.No.1646/2006 01.08.2012 Shri Akhil Singh, Advocate for the appellants.

Shri Alok Jain, Advocate has filed I.A.No.7572/2012 to change the counsel.

As per the averments made in the application it is apparent that the respondents want to change their counsel and engage Shri Alok Jain, Advocate.

Considering the reasons so stated in the application, it is allowed.

Shri Alok Jain, Advocate may file his Vakalatnama within a week.

Heard on I.A.No.7582/2012, which is an application for deleting the name of appellant No.1 who has died.

Considering the reasons so stated in the application, it is allowed.

Permission to delete the name of appellant No.1 granted.

Needful be done within a week.

List this case on 22nd August, 2012 for orders on I.A.No.7883/2012.

(J.K.Maheshwari) Judge ap

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial