ismaile Sa Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

ismaile Sa vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 01, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1050595

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1050595
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 01, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ismaile Sa

Advocate Shri. Nitin Karan

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.10673/2012 ismaile sa versus state of m.p.& ors.01.08.2012 shri nitin karan learned counsel for the petitioner. shri samdarshi tiwari, learned govt. advocate for the respondent/state. as per directions issued by this court, respondent no.4 shri mangal singh, town inspector, police station chhapara, district seoni, has produced respondent no.6 praveen bano before this court as it is alleged by the petitioner that he has entered into wedlock with respondent no.6 who is being forcefully kept in custody by her parents against her wishes. respondent no.6 praveen bano who is present in person, on being asked, specifically states that she has not entered into marriage with the petitioner and that she wishes to stay with her parents from whose custody she has been produced before this court. in view of the statement of respondent no.6, the writ as prayed for by the petitioner deserves to be and is hereby rejected. the petition, filed by the petitioner, is accordingly dismissed. ( r.s.jha ) judge mms/-

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.10673/2012 Ismaile Sa versus State of M.P.& ORS.01.08.2012 Shri Nitin Karan learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, learned Govt.

Advocate for the respondent/State.

As per directions issued by this Court, respondent no.4 Shri Mangal Singh, Town Inspector, Police Station Chhapara, District Seoni, has produced respondent no.6 Praveen Bano before this Court as it is alleged by the petitioner that he has entered into wedlock with respondent no.6 who is being forcefully kept in custody by her parents against her wishes.

Respondent no.6 Praveen Bano who is present in person, on being asked, specifically states that she has not entered into marriage with the petitioner and that she wishes to stay with her parents from whose custody she has been produced before this Court.

In view of the statement of respondent no.6, the writ as prayed for by the petitioner deserves to be and is hereby rejected.

The petition, filed by the petitioner, is accordingly dismissed.

( R.S.JHA ) JUDGE mms/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties ismaile Sa vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education