Prem Lal Ukey Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Prem Lal Ukey vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 18, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1050413

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1050413
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Sep 18, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prem Lal Ukey

Advocate Shri. D.K.Dixit

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Advocate Shri. Sanjay Sarvate

Excerpt

prem lal ukey versus state of m.p.& ors.writ petition no.16592 ”18. 10.2012: shri d.k.dixit, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri sanjeev kumar singh, learned panel lawyer for respondent nos.1, 2 & 3. shri sanjay sarvate, learned counsel for respondent no.4. respondent no.4 shri jag lal thakre has filed an affidavit today along with documents being document not d/1 dated 13.10.2012 indicating that the charge of principal of the aforesaid school has been handed over to the petitioner on 13.10.2012 vide handing over of charge memo dated 13.10.2012. in view of above affidavit filed by respondent no.4, no further action is required to be taken in the matter and the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. the petition is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge ss/-

Full Judgment

Prem Lal Ukey versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.16592 ”

18. 10.2012: Shri D.K.Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3.

Shri Sanjay Sarvate, learned counsel for respondent No.4.

Respondent No.4 Shri Jag Lal Thakre has filed an affidavit today along with documents being document not D/1 dated 13.10.2012 indicating that the charge of Principal of the aforesaid school has been handed over to the petitioner on 13.10.2012 vide handing over of charge memo dated 13.10.2012.

In view of above affidavit filed by respondent No.4, no further action is required to be taken in the matter and the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

The petition is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Prem Lal Ukey vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education