Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jitendra Thakre Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Jitendra Thakre vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 18, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1050237

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jitendra Thakre

Advocate Shri. J. Arya

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.11401/2013 (ankit shrivas and others versus state of mp and others.18.07.2013 heard shri j. arya, learned counsel for the petitioners and shri rahul rawat, p.l.for the state on the question of admission and interim relief. the learned panel lawyer appearing for the state/respondents submits that a similar petition which has been registered as w.p.no.6129/2013(s) raising identical issue has already been dismissed by this court on 15-4-2013, copy of the order passed in the aforesaid writ petition is produced before this court. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has relied upon another order of the learned single judge of this court passed in w.p.no.4529/2013 (smt. sanyogita thakur versus state of madhya pradesh) decided on 21-3-2013 by which this court, while dismissing the petition has made certain observations. it is observed that the order in the aforesaid case was passed on the basis of a statement/undertaking given by the counsel appearing for the state. however, no such statement/undertaking is given before this court in the present case and therefore, the present petition is dismissed in the light of w.p.no.6129/13 (s) decided on 15-4-2013 in similar terms and for the same reasons as stated therein, which may be read as part of this order. ( r.s.jha ) judge msp

Full Judgment

W.P.No.11401/2013 (Ankit Shrivas and others versus State of MP and otheRs.18.07.2013 Heard Shri J.

Arya, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Rahul Rawat, P.L.for the State on the question of admission and interim relief.

The learned panel lawyer appearing for the State/respondents submits that a similar petition which has been registered as W.P.No.6129/2013(S) raising identical issue has already been dismissed by this Court on 15-4-2013, copy of the order passed in the aforesaid writ petition is produced before this Court.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has relied upon another order of the learned single Judge of this Court passed in W.P.No.4529/2013 (Smt.

Sanyogita Thakur versus State of Madhya Pradesh) decided on 21-3-2013 by which this Court, while dismissing the petition has made certain observations.

It is observed that the order in the aforesaid case was passed on the basis of a statement/undertaking given by the counsel appearing for the State.

However, no such statement/undertaking is given before this Court in the present case and therefore, the present petition is dismissed in the light of W.P.No.6129/13 (S) decided on 15-4-2013 in similar terms and for the same reasons as stated therein, which may be read as part of this order.

( R.S.Jha ) Judge msp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial