M.C.C.No.922/2013 31.07.2013 Mr.S.K.Garg, learned counsel for the applicants.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the respondents were not represented as the case has been dismissed for want of prosecution.
Heard on I.A.No.8356/2013, an application for condonation of delay.
For the reasons stated in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit, I find sufficient cause for condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration is made out.
The delay is condoned.
Accordingly, I.A.No.8356/2013 is allowed.
Having heard the learned counsel for the applicants and taking into account the averments made in the application which are duly supported by an affidavit, I am satisfied that sufficient cause for restoration of the second appeal is made out.
Accordingly, the S.A.No.664/2001 is restored to file subject to payment of costs of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) in the office of the M.P.High Court Legal Services Committee within a period of 10 days.
Accordingly, the MCC is allowed.
(Alok Aradhe) Judge RC