Jodha Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Jodha vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 02, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049998

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1049998
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jan 02, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jodha

Advocate Shri. Vinot Kumar Dubey

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

jodha versus state & ors.serial no.:1 writ petition no.21362 ”2. 1.2013: shri vinot kumar dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. challenge to the show-cause notice issued to petitioner for removing encroachment under section 248 of the m.p.land revenue code, petitioner has filed this writ petition. against show-cause notice issued petitioner has remedy of raising the objection and after orders are passed petitioner has remedy of filing firs.appeal, second appeal under section 44 of the m.p.land revenue code and thereafter revision under section 15, therefore, a petition directly before this court without taking recours.of all this statutory remedy is not permissible. accordingly granting liberty to the petitioner to take recours.of statutory remedy available this petition is disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge ss/-

Full Judgment

Jodha versus State & ORS.Serial No.:1 Writ Petition No.21362 ”

2. 1.2013: Shri Vinot Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Challenge to the show-cause notice issued to petitioner for removing encroachment under Section 248 of the M.P.Land Revenue Code, petitioner has filed this writ petition.

Against show-cause notice issued petitioner has remedy of raising the objection and after orders are passed petitioner has remedy of filing fiRs.appeal, second appeal under Section 44 of the M.P.Land Revenue Code and thereafter revision under Section 15, therefore, a petition directly before this Court without taking recouRs.of all this statutory remedy is not permissible.

Accordingly granting liberty to the petitioner to take recouRs.of statutory remedy available this petition is disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Jodha vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition