Darbari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Darbari vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jun 06, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049948

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1049948
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jun 06, 2013
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Darbari

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.4301/2013 (darbari versus state of m.p.) 06/06/2013 shri rajnish pandey, advocate for the applicant. shri ajay tamrakar, govt. advocate for the respondent/state. case diary is perused. learned counsel for the rival parties are heard. this is firs.application under section 438 cr.p.c.by the applicant for grant of anticipatory bail. applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with offences punishable under sections 420 & 506 of ipc registered as crime no.89/2013 at police station madhav nagar, katni (m.p.).learned govt. advocate for respondent/ state has opposed the bail application and prays for its rejection by contending that on the basis of the allegation and the material available on record, no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. it is submitted on behalf of the applicant that it is a case where bail can be granted, because due to some previous enmity, a false report has been lodged against the applicant after a lapse of period of near about four years.looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the opinion of this court, it cannot be said that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case and therefore, it is not a fit case where anticipatory bail can be granted to the applicant. accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is hereby dismissed. (b.d.rathi) vacation judge sj/-

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.4301/2013 (Darbari versus State of M.P.) 06/06/2013 Shri Rajnish Pandey, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Govt.

Advocate for the respondent/State.

Case Diary is perused.

Learned counsel for the rival parties are heard.

This is fiRs.application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.by the applicant for grant of anticipatory bail.

Applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with offences punishable under Sections 420 & 506 of IPC registered as Crime No.89/2013 at Police Station Madhav Nagar, Katni (M.P.).Learned Govt.

Advocate for respondent/ State has opposed the bail application and prays for its rejection by contending that on the basis of the allegation and the material available on record, no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out.

It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that it is a case where bail can be granted, because due to some previous enmity, a false report has been lodged against the applicant after a lapse of period of near about four yeaRs.Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the opinion of this Court, it cannot be said that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case and therefore, it is not a fit case where anticipatory bail can be granted to the applicant.

Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is hereby dismissed.

(B.D.Rathi) Vacation Judge SJ/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Darbari vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Miscellaneous