Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Pawan Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Pawan Sharma vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 24, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049874

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pawan Sharma

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

criminal revision no.1225/2013 24.07.2013 shri ashok koshta, advocate for the applicant. shri umesh pandey, govt. advocate for the state. heard. applicant/accused pawan sharma has filed this revision against the order dated 6.6.2013 passed by additional sessions judge, piparia in sessions trial no.250/2012 rejecting the application filed by him under section 311 of the code of criminal procedure for recalling santo bai (pw3).accused pawan sharma is facing trial under sections 363, 366 and 376 of the indian penal code. at this stage, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this revision. accordingly, this revision is dismissed as not pressed. (rakesh saksena) judge ad/

Full Judgment

Criminal Revision No.1225/2013 24.07.2013 Shri Ashok Koshta, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Umesh Pandey, Govt.

Advocate for the State.

Heard.

Applicant/accused Pawan Sharma has filed this revision against the order dated 6.6.2013 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Piparia in Sessions Trial No.250/2012 rejecting the application filed by him under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for recalling Santo Bai (PW3).Accused Pawan Sharma is facing trial under Sections 363, 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this revision.

Accordingly, this revision is dismissed as not pressed.

(RAKESH SAKSENA) JUDGE AD/

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Pawan Sharma vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales