Devashish Dutta Vs. the Nepa Limited

Devashish Dutta vs The Nepa Limited

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 24, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049872

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1049872
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 24, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devashish Dutta

Advocate Shri. Darshan Soni

Respondent

The Nepa Limited

Advocate Shri. Rajneesh Gupta

Excerpt

1 wa no.408/12 24.07.2013. shri darshan soni, learned counsel for appellant. shri rajneesh gupta, learned counsel for respondent. ia no.9818/13 an application for withdrawal of the appeal. by this application, the appellant is seeking permission of this court to withdraw this appeal. prayer is opposed by shri gupta on the ground that the respondent has also preferred an appeal against the same order, but not the matter has been settled between the parties out of the court and he may be allowed to file the settlement before this court. as the appellant is seeking withdrawal of this appeal without any liberty, such prayer can be allowed even at this juncture. so far as settlement between the parties is concerned, respondent may file the aforesaid settlement in the appeal preferred by it against the impugned order which is stated to be pending before this court. with the aforesaid liberty, this application is allowed. consequently, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no orders as to cost. c.c.as per rules. (krishn kumar lahoti) (subhash kakade) acting chief justice judge. 2 jk.

Full Judgment

1 WA No.408/12 24.07.2013.

Shri Darshan Soni, learned counsel for appellant.

Shri Rajneesh Gupta, learned counsel for respondent.

IA No.9818/13 an application for withdrawal of the appeal.

By this application, the appellant is seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal.

Prayer is opposed by Shri Gupta on the ground that the respondent has also preferred an appeal against the same order, but not the matter has been settled between the parties out of the Court and he may be allowed to file the settlement before this Court.

As the appellant is seeking withdrawal of this appeal without any liberty, such prayer can be allowed even at this juncture.

So far as settlement between the parties is concerned, respondent may file the aforesaid settlement in the appeal preferred by it against the impugned order which is stated to be pending before this Court.

With the aforesaid liberty, this application is allowed.

Consequently, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no orders as to cost.

C.c.as per rules.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Subhash Kakade) Acting Chief Justice Judge.

2 Jk.

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Devashish Dutta vs The Nepa Limited Same Subject Education