Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Devendra Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 20, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049840

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devendra Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no.2426/2013 20.02.2013 mr.deepak okhade, learned counsel for the petitioner. mr.rajesh tiwari, learned government advocate for the respondents. with consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. heard. in this writ petition, the petitioner inter-alia seeks a direction to the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of village employment assistant. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was selected for the post of village employment assistant in respect of gram panchayat kuvarpur vide resolution dated 22.7.2012 and 2.10.2012. however, the order of appointment has not been issued. learned counsel for the petitioner at the out set submitted that he has submitted a representation with regard to his grievance contained in annexure p/9 to the competent authority and the competent authority be directed to decide the representation within a time bound period. on the other hand, learned government advocate submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner shall be dealt with in accordance with law. in view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the representation submitted by the petitioner shall be decided by the competent authority expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today, by a speaking order. it is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. certified copy as per rules. (alok aradhe) judge rc.

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No.2426/2013 20.02.2013 Mr.Deepak Okhade, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr.Rajesh Tiwari, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally.

Heard.

In this writ petition, the petitioner inter-alia seeks a direction to the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of Village Employment Assistant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was selected for the post of Village Employment Assistant in respect of Gram Panchayat Kuvarpur vide resolution dated 22.7.2012 and 2.10.2012.

However, the order of appointment has not been issued.

Learned counsel for the petitioner at the out set submitted that he has submitted a representation with regard to his grievance contained in Annexure P/9 to the Competent Authority and the Competent Authority be directed to decide the representation within a time bound period.

On the other hand, learned Government Advocate submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner shall be dealt with in accordance with law.

In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the representation submitted by the petitioner shall be decided by the Competent Authority expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today, by a speaking order.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Alok Aradhe) Judge RC.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial