Dhanraj Vs. Ashok Kumar

Dhanraj vs Ashok Kumar

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 20, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049824

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1049824
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Feb 20, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dhanraj

Respondent

Ashok Kumar

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.14676/2012 20.02.2013 petitioners by shri a.k.jain, advocate. service of notice of this petition on respondent is still awaited. on perusal of the notice returned unserved, it appears that address of the respondent is not correctly mentioned on it. let a repeated notice of this petition be sent to the respondent by r.a.d.with correct and complete particulars of address. steps be taken within seven working days. notice is returnable within three weeks. petitioner shall ensure that correct particulars of the respondent are mentioned and office is also directed to check it and then will send the notice to the respondent. learned counsel for the petitioner prays for ex-parte stay of the proceedings on the ground that service of notice was made on one suresh who was neither the relative not member of the respondent and cognizance of the matter has been taken on the basis of the affidavits of the respondent. however, no case of grant of ex- parte stay of proceedings is made out. application for stay of proceedings of trial court shall be heard and decided on appearance of parties. list on 20.3.2013. (tarun kumar kaushal) judge ys/

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.14676/2012 20.02.2013 Petitioners by Shri A.K.Jain, Advocate.

Service of notice of this petition on respondent is still awaited.

On perusal of the notice returned unserved, it appears that address of the respondent is not correctly mentioned on it.

Let a repeated notice of this petition be sent to the respondent by R.A.D.with correct and complete particulars of address.

Steps be taken within seven working days.

Notice is returnable within three weeks.

Petitioner shall ensure that correct particulars of the respondent are mentioned and office is also directed to check it and then will send the notice to the respondent.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for ex-parte stay of the proceedings on the ground that service of notice was made on one Suresh who was neither the relative not member of the respondent and cognizance of the matter has been taken on the basis of the affidavits of the respondent.

However, no case of grant of ex- parte stay of proceedings is made out.

Application for stay of proceedings of trial court shall be heard and decided on appearance of parties.

List on 20.3.2013.

(Tarun Kumar Kaushal) Judge YS/

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Dhanraj vs Ashok Kumar Same Subject Education