Meera Dhamle Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Meera Dhamle vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 20, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049821

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1049821
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Feb 20, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Meera Dhamle

Advocate Shri. S.K.Dubey

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ appeal no.146/2013 (meera dhamle versus state of m.p.& ors.) 20.02.2013 shri s.k.dubey, learned counsel for the appellant. shri sanjay dwivedi, learned govt. advocate for the respondents-state. heard on the question of admission. on consent of the learned counsel for the parties the matter is finally heard. this intra-court appeal has been preferred against the order passed by the learned single judge in writ petition n0.22050/2012, dated 24-12-2012. we have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant. we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the learned single judge, except to the extent that the time granted by the learned single judge for vacating the bungalow is hereby extended by a period of six months from the date of its expiry. the writ appeal is accordingly disposed of. (s.a.bobde) (k.k.trivedi) chief justice judge ac.

Full Judgment

Writ Appeal No.146/2013 (Meera Dhamle versus State of M.P.& Ors.) 20.02.2013 Shri S.K.Dubey, learned counsel for the appellant.

Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, learned Govt.

Advocate for the respondents-State.

Heard on the question of admission.

On consent of the learned counsel for the parties the matter is finally heard.

This intra-court appeal has been preferred against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition N0.22050/2012, dated 24-12-2012.

We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant.

We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, except to the extent that the time granted by the learned Single Judge for vacating the bungalow is hereby extended by a period of six months from the date of its expiry.

The writ appeal is accordingly disposed of.

(S.A.Bobde) (K.K.Trivedi) Chief Justice Judge ac.

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Meera Dhamle vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education