Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devendra Singh Rajput Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Devendra Singh Rajput vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 28, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049626

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devendra Singh Rajput

Advocate Shri. Y.M.Tiwari

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Advocate Shri. Kamlesh Dwivedi, Shri. Praveen Verma

Excerpt

devendra singh rajput versus state & ors.w.p.no.1272/2011 28/09/2012 shri y.m.tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri rajesh tiwari, learned ga for the respondents/state. shri kamlesh dwivedi, learned counsel for respondent no.4. shri praveen verma, learned counsel for respondent no.5. i.a.no.8250/2012 has been filed by respondent no.4 indicating that no record of the enquiry is available and certain explanation is given to indicate that the records are not available. keeping in view the aforesaid, not the matter has to be heard finally and consequential effect of the record being not produced has to be considered and a decision taken finally. in view of the above, office is directed to list the petition for final disposal at motion stage in the week commencing from 5th of november, 2012. (rajendra menon) judge nd

Full Judgment

Devendra Singh Rajput versus State & ORS.W.P.No.1272/2011 28/09/2012 Shri Y.M.Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned GA for the respondents/State.

Shri Kamlesh Dwivedi, learned counsel for Respondent No.4.

Shri Praveen Verma, learned counsel for Respondent No.5.

I.A.No.8250/2012 has been filed by Respondent No.4 indicating that no record of the enquiry is available and certain explanation is given to indicate that the records are not available.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, not the matter has to be heard finally and consequential effect of the record being not produced has to be considered and a decision taken finally.

In view of the above, office is directed to list the petition for final disposal at motion stage in the week commencing from 5th of November, 2012.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge nd

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial