Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kissinger Vs. Halperin

Kissinger vs Halperin

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-22-1981
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/104957

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
452 U.S. 713
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kissinger

Respondent

Halperin

Excerpt

kissinger v. halperin - 452 u.s. 713 (1981) u.s. supreme court kissinger v. halperin, 452 u.s. 713 (1981) 452 u.s. 713 kissinger et al. v. halperin et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit. no. 79-880. argued december 8, 1980. decided june 22, 1981. 196 u.s. app. d.c. 285, 606 f.2d 1192 , affirmed in part by an equally divided court, and certiorari dismissed in part. solicitor general mccree argued the cause for petitioners. with him on the briefs were assistant attorney general daniel, deputy solicitor general geller, mark i. levy, barbara l. herwig, and larry l. gregg. mark h. lynch argued the cause for respondents. with him on the brief were john h. f. shattuck, alan b. morrison, and john cary sims. * per curiam. the judgment with respect to petitioners kissinger, nixon, and mitchell is affirmed by an equally divided court. with respect to petitioner haldeman, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. justice rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [ footnote * ] briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by bertram zweibon, pro se, for bertram zweibon et al.; and by leon friedman, floyd abrams, gerald j. brown, and james c. goodale for hedrick smith et al. page 452 u.s. 713, 714

Full Judgment

KISSINGER v. HALPERIN - 452 U.S. 713 (1981)
U.S. Supreme Court KISSINGER v. HALPERIN, 452 U.S. 713 (1981) 452 U.S. 713

KISSINGER ET AL. v. HALPERIN ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
No. 79-880.

Argued December 8, 1980.
Decided June 22, 1981.

196 U.S. App. D.C. 285, 606 F.2d 1192 , affirmed in part by an equally divided Court, and certiorari dismissed in part.

Solicitor General McCree argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Assistant Attorney General Daniel, Deputy Solicitor General Geller, Mark I. Levy, Barbara L. Herwig, and Larry L. Gregg.

Mark H. Lynch argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were John H. F. Shattuck, Alan B. Morrison, and John Cary Sims. *

PER CURIAM.

The judgment with respect to petitioners Kissinger, Nixon, and Mitchell is affirmed by an equally divided Court. With respect to petitioner Haldeman, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

JUSTICE REHNQUIST took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[ Footnote * ] Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by Bertram Zweibon, pro se, for Bertram Zweibon et al.; and by Leon Friedman, Floyd Abrams, Gerald J. Brown, and James C. Goodale for Hedrick Smith et al.

Page 452 U.S. 713, 714



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial