Arjun Kumar Vijaykar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Arjun Kumar Vijaykar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 10, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049232

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1049232
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 10, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arjun Kumar Vijaykar

Advocate Shri. Jitendra Arya

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

arjun kumar vijaykar versus state w.p.no.17110/2012 10-10-2012 shri jitendra arya, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri rajesh tiwari, learned govt. adv.for the respondents on advance notice. petitioner is working as assistant development extension officer in janpad panchayat amla, district betul and by the impugned order dated 13.7.2012 he has been transferred from amla to janpad panchayat, harda. challenge to the order of transfer is made mainly on the ground of no administrative necessity being available or on the ground that petitioner has only completed two years and he is being transferred even before period of three years has been completed. the order of transfer indicates that in annual transfer exercise along with the petitioner more than 30 employees have been transferred and the grounds raised in this petition are not such on the basis of judicial review of an administrative order is permissible. accordingly directing the competent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner which is pending within a period of four weeks, this petition stands disposed of. with the aforesaid, petition stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge mrs.mishra

Full Judgment

arjun kumar vijaykar versus state W.P.No.17110/2012 10-10-2012 Shri Jitendra Arya, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt.

Adv.for the respondents on advance notice.

Petitioner is working as Assistant Development Extension Officer in Janpad Panchayat Amla, District Betul and by the impugned order dated 13.7.2012 he has been transferred from Amla to Janpad Panchayat, Harda.

Challenge to the order of transfer is made mainly on the ground of no administrative necessity being available or on the ground that petitioner has only completed two years and he is being transferred even before period of three years has been completed.

The order of transfer indicates that in annual transfer exercise along with the petitioner more than 30 employees have been transferred and the grounds raised in this petition are not such on the basis of judicial review of an administrative order is permissible.

Accordingly directing the competent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner which is pending within a period of four weeks, this petition stands disposed of.

With the aforesaid, petition stands disposed of.

c.c.as per rules.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Mrs.mishra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Arjun Kumar Vijaykar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education