Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Harishankar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Harishankar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 10, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049228

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Harishankar

Advocate Shri. Vinay Pratap Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.16766/12 10.10.2012: shri vinay pratap singh, learned counsel for the petitioners.shri rajesh tiwari, learned government advocate, for the respondents/state. keeping in view the order already passed by this court in the case of maha singh marabi and others versus state of m.p.and others in w.p.no.10071/10 (s) on 2 nd december, 2011 and the order passed in w.p.no.10000/10 home guard sainik evam parivar kalyan sangh and others versus state of m.p.and another and as the relief claimed by the petitioners is similar in the aforesaid two cases, respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners herein also in the light of the orders already passed on 2/12/11 in the cases as referred to hereinabove and proceed in the matter in accordance with law. petitioners be also conferred the similar benefit as conferred to other similarly situated employees by virtue of the orders passed as indicated hereinabove. with the aforesaid, petition stands allowed and disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge vy/-

Full Judgment

W.P.No.16766/12 10.10.2012: Shri Vinay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Government Advocate, for the respondents/State.

Keeping in view the order already passed by this Court in the case of Maha Singh Marabi and others versus State of M.P.and others in W.P.No.10071/10 (s) on 2 nd December, 2011 and the order passed in W.P.No.10000/10 Home Guard Sainik Evam Parivar Kalyan Sangh and others versus State of M.P.and another and as the relief claimed by the petitioners is similar in the aforesaid two cases, respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners herein also in the light of the orders already passed on 2/12/11 in the cases as referred to hereinabove and proceed in the matter in accordance with law.

Petitioners be also conferred the similar benefit as conferred to other similarly situated employees by virtue of the orders passed as indicated hereinabove.

With the aforesaid, petition stands allowed and disposed of.

Certified Copy as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge Vy/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial