Vanshropan Singh Vs. Pyari Devi

Vanshropan Singh vs Pyari Devi

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided May 08, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049071

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1049071
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: May 08, 2013
Subject: Banking

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Banking

Key legal issue: Banking

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vanshropan Singh

Respondent

Pyari Devi

Excerpt

writ petition no ::2985. / 2013 vanshropan singh versus pyari devi and others 08.05.2013. shri praveen pandey for the petitioner. against the order passed by the additional commissioner, shahdol impugned in this writ petition, petitioner has a remedy of filing a revision before the board of revenue and learned counsel submits that he proposes to file a review before the commissioner himself. granting liberty to the petitioner to take recours.to the remedy as is indicated hereinabove, for the present, this petition is disposed of. accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. certified copy of the impugned order be returned back to learned counsel for the petitioner, on his filing a photocopy of the same. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No ::

2985. / 2013 Vanshropan Singh versus Pyari Devi and others 08.05.2013.

Shri Praveen Pandey for the petitioner.

Against the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Shahdol impugned in this writ petition, petitioner has a remedy of filing a revision before the Board of Revenue and learned counsel submits that he proposes to file a review before the Commissioner himself.

Granting liberty to the petitioner to take recouRs.to the remedy as is indicated hereinabove, for the present, this petition is disposed of.

Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.

Certified copy of the impugned order be returned back to learned counsel for the petitioner, on his filing a photocopy of the same.

Certified copy as per rules.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Vanshropan Singh vs Pyari Devi Same Subject Banking